Contents
Keynote Plenary Panel
Expanding the Boundaries of Long-term Atmospheric Monitoring
Session One
Atmospheric Deposition Patterns and Trends
Session Two
Mercury Emissions and Atmospheric Deposition
Session Three
Ecological Effects and Critical Loads I
Session Four
Ecological Effects and Critical Loads II
Session Five
Improving our Understanding of the Reactive Nitrogen Budget
Session Six
Modeling to Understand Emissions and Source Apportionment of Reactive Nitrogen
Session Seven
Measurement of Atmospheric Mercury and Emerging Pollutants
Session 7: Measurement of Atmospheric Mercury and Emerging Pollutants
Moderator: Mark OlsonPassive air sampling for mercury on a global scale to fill the gaps – a Canadian led pilot study
Alexandra Steffen, Environment and Climate Change CanadaAbstract
Network Implementation of a Mercury Passive Air Sampler (MerPAS) Method: Overcoming Technical and Quality Assurance Challenges
Eric Prestbo, Tekran ResearchAbstract
Evaluation of the Efficacy of the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) National Trends Network (NTN) for Assessment of PFAS Deposition in Precipitation
Martin Shafer, University of Wisconsin - State Laboratory of HygieneAbstract
A new system that provides accurate, precise, hourly measurements of oxidized mercury can improve dry deposition estimates
Seth Lyman, Utah State UniversityAbstract
Applying New Technologies to Arctic Mercury Monitoring
Sarrah Dunham-Cheatham, University of Nevada, RenoAbstract
Need of New Measurements of Atmospheric Mercury and Reactive Nitrogen in South Asia
Umesh Kulshrestha, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITYAbstract
Wildfire Tracer Molecules Used for Source Appropriation of Atmospheric Deposition Constituents from Combustion Emissions
Jeramy Jasmann, U.S. Geological SurveyAbstract
Potential for Determing Black Carbon Wet Deposition Fluxes from the NADP Network
Ross Edwards, Wisconsin State Hygiene LaboratoryAbstract